Mt Edgcumbe roundup

It was a terrible day for taking photographs, when it wasn’t actually raining it was desperately dull. It was however, mild, and that had brought a number of plants into flower since last week.

Peter Betteley left his camellia collection to the park and amongst it are two bushes, planted side by side and both labelled ‘Peter Betteley’. The name has been registered and in the register the parentage is given as ‘Bokuhan’ x ‘Scented Sun’, with credit for the cross going to Lee Stenning, curator of the collection. He tells me that is not in fact so, that they came from Mr Betteley along with the rest of his collection.


Camellia ‘Peter Betteley’ 1P-039


The bush in the picture above had a bloom open on 29/11/16 and now has many open and some dropped to the ground. The other bush has just opened its first blooms so is running about two weeks behind. Back in October I compared the foliage and took pictures. I am tentatively of the opinion that they are different, probably sister seedlings. I shall be keeping a close watch on them both. Whatever the situation, both appear to have a very long flowering season with blooms that stand up well in bad weather but fall rather than withering on the bush.


‘Peter Betteley’, 1P-039 on left, 1P-040 on right.


Peter Betteley, 1P-039 on left, 1P-040 on right.

To my eye, the foliage of 1P-039 is smoother, narrower and has a somewhat downrolled edge. The differences are consistent over the whole bush.

Another small group of plants that test my abilities to tell them apart are the sasanqua x reticulata hybrids. There are three in the collection, Dream Girl, Flower Girl and Show Girl. I checked on Flower Girl, she needs another week. Show Girl is up and running though and will bloom for months. These blooms are 11cm across.


Camellia ‘Show Girl’

Elsewhere, the sasanquas are in the main going over, one notable exception being ‘Bonanza’, which is really outstanding for floriferousness and intensity of colour.


Camellia hiemalis ‘Bonanza’

Each week sees one or two more early japonicas showing their hand. Some have just an odd bloom, others are putting on more of a display, weather permitting.


                 Top row: Daikagura, Nobilissima, Mabel Blackwell, Gloire de Nantes                  Bottom row: Alexander Black, Elizabeth Rose Open, Campsii Alba, Benidaikagura

What’s in a name?

It can be very easy to decide that a plant is labelled incorrectly: the flower is white when it should be red, single when it should be double. It is almost never as simple to decide what it actually is.
There is in Section 1G a low, wide spreading plant that is flowering white in December. It is labelled ‘Chansonette’.


The offending label

The true ‘Chansonette’ has semi-double blooms about 6cm across and cerise in colour. It would be flowering at about the same time and its foliage would be very similar.


Camellia x hiemalis ‘Chansonette’

In the collection records the bush is said to have come from Coghurst Nursery, one of two planted in 2002. The other plant is growing in a different place, struggling somewhat and not in flower.

It is not neccessarily the case that the nursery supplied the wrong plant but it does happen. They may have bought in young plants, grown them on to a saleable size but not seen some or any of the batch in flower.
Looking at their website reveals that they list only three pure white sasanqua type camellias and two of them are clearly different. The third, ‘Kenkyo’, looks to be a very good match.
Looking at pictures I have taken of ‘Kenkyo’ and every other picture of it that I can find, in print and online, I am fairly confident that I have a match.


One of functions of National Collections is as a reference against which unknown material can be matched. To be fit for purpose they have to be accurately labelled. The question is what level of certainty is acceptable?

To jail a man for life the standard is beyond reasonable doubt, to win a civil case it is on the balance of probabilities. Both tests will mean different things to different people. The label on a plant could be very important to one person and of no interest whatever to another. Some gardeners keep  notebooks of everything they plant and keep labels on the plants, others throw the labels away at planting time and are happy not to know the name.

Is it better to have a name on a plant that is probably right than one that is definitely wrong? Is a label that says Camellia sasanqua var. any use to anyone? What is the worst that could happen if it were wrong?
I want it to matter enough to justify making the effort of getting right in the first place, otherwise why bother labelling them at all?

I am told that these sorts of thoughts make me a systemizer; which I don’t think is a compliment. Shakespeare would not have sympathised, “a rose / By any other name would smell as sweet.”